Definition of an Ideologue, by David Brooks

If you read this rubbish in The New York Times from David Brooks he does actually define the choice in this election:

Modern Head of State or Ideologue

Here are Brooks' closing comments:

"Republicans and Democrats have different conceptions of the presidency. Republicans admire a president who is elevated above his executive branch colleagues. It is impossible to imagine George W. Bush or Reagan as a cabinet secretary. Instead, they are set apart by virtue of exceptional moral qualities. Relying on their core values, they set broad goals and remain resolute in times of crisis.

Democrats see the presidency as a much more ministerial job. They admire presidents who engage in constant deliberative conversations. Democrats from Carter through Mondale, Dukakis, Clinton, Gore and Kerry have all been well versed in the inner workings of government. "

To claim exceptional morality for the Republicans is idiotic, just ask Jimmy Carter. As is their claim to broad vision or resolution in crises. The truth, really, is that in addition to those qualities of strength, Democrats improve their lot with a thoughtful understanding of our place in the Global theater and a vision of the entire planet that extends far into the future.

The difference is whether your strength and resolve are guided by blindness and ignorance or informed thought.